Venita Reeder v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claimant's seasonal work as a fruit picker qualified as past relevant work
• “work may be considered gainful … if it is the type of work usually done for pay or profit
• “We find it unnecessary to engage in this averaging debate.”
• “While a deficiency in opinion-writing is not a sufficient reason to set aside an ALJ’s finding, where the deficiency [has] no practical effect on the outcome of the case, inaccuracies, incomplete analyses, and unresolved conflicts of evidence can serve as a basis to remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).