Venhaus v. Shultz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• negligent 5 interference with prospective economic advantage has same elements as tortious interference, 6 except that defendant’s conduct need not be intentional
• elements of a negligent interference with prospective economic advantage claim
• a 4 defendant incurs liability under negligent interference “only if the defendant’s conduct was 5 independently wrongful, [but] we have been directed to no California authority, and have found 6 none, for the trial court’s conclusion that the wrongful conduct must be intentional or willful.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).