Skip to main content
· 6/7/2004

Venegas-Hernandez v. Sonolux Records

Citations

  • 370 F.3d 183
  • 58 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1092
  • 71 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1016
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11090
  • 2004 WL 1242331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion for injunctive relief, because the movant \[sought] an award of pecuniary damages\ to \make it whole\
  • proceeding to address Rule 59(e) error in part because the “plaintiffs have waived the issue of the availability of the Rule 59(e) motion to defendant”
  • noting trial court’s discretion in deciding Rule 59(e) motions requires balancing “need for finality of judgments with the need to render a just decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, John, Lynch, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.