Vendura, Jr. v. Boxer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment based on denial of pension benefits and holding that plaintiff’s contradicting interpretation of the plan was unreasonable because it rendered a plan provision superfluous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Amyndas Pharmaceuticals, S.A. v. Zealand Pharma A/S
  First Circuit· 2022-09-02· cited 68×
• Martinez v. Sun Life Assurance Co.
  First Circuit· 2020-01-27· cited 10×
• Oliver Collins v. University of Notre Dame Du La
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-07-12
• Roibas v. EBPA, LLC
  D. Maine· 2018-09-28

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Luis E. Rodriguez-Abreu v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
  First Circuit· 1993-02-25· cited 233×
• James Bellino v. Schlumberger Technologies, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1991-11-20· cited 94×
• Wright v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. Group Benefits Plan
  First Circuit· 2005-03-25· cited 80×
• Penncro Associates, Inc. v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-08-24· cited 72×
• Taracorp, Inc. v. Nl Industries, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-02-13· cited 64×
• Kolling v. American Power Conversion Corp.
  First Circuit· 2003-10-16· cited 53×
• Islander East Pipeline Company, LLC v. State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
  Second Circuit· 2006-10-05· cited 45×
• Diaz v. Seafarers International Union
  First Circuit· 1994-01-14· cited 42×
• Tetreault v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance
  First Circuit· 2014-10-06· cited 22×
• Bowers Hydraulic Dredging Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1908-11-30· cited 21×
• Robert T. Bouchard v. Crystal Coin Shop, Inc., Etc.
  First Circuit· 1988-03-25· cited 16×
• Hannington v. Sun Life and Health Insurance
  First Circuit· 2013-03-29· cited 9×