· 7/12/2005
Vendetta Jackson v. City of Chicago
Citations
- 414 F.3d 806
- 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1601
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13968
- 2 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 12
- 2005 WL 1618822
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing there’s no “hard and fast rule” for assigning responsibility when a breakdown occurs and noting that asymmetrical access to information may be a consideration
- “[T]o determine whether the [RA] has been violated in the employment context, we refer to the provisions and standards of the [ADA].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ripple, Wood, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.