Skip to main content
· 7/12/2005

Vendetta Jackson v. City of Chicago

Citations

  • 414 F.3d 806
  • 16 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1601
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13968
  • 2 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 12
  • 2005 WL 1618822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing there’s no “hard and fast rule” for assigning responsibility when a breakdown occurs and noting that asymmetrical access to information may be a consideration
  • “[T]o determine whether the [RA] has been violated in the employment context, we refer to the provisions and standards of the [ADA].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Wood, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.