Venclauskas v. State of Connecticut, Dept. of Public Safety Division of State Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiffs claim and focusing solely on major life activity of working, even though plaintiffs claim ostensibly referred to seeing and driving as well
• fact that plaintiff did not have sufficient visual acuity to work as trooper for state police did not render plaintiff substantially limited in major life activity because he could work for other police forces

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).