Skip to main content
· 2/26/1997

Velma L. Brown v. General Telephone Company of California

Citations

  • 108 F.3d 208
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1338
  • 6 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 617
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 1993
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3420
  • 1997 WL 78450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a pro se plaintiff could not raise a new issue on appeal where she failed to raise the issue before district court
  • holding that a pro se plaintiff could not raise a new issue on appeal where she failed to raise the issue before district court
  • holding that a pro se plaintiff may not raise a new issue on appeal where the issue was not raised before the district court
  • pro se appellant's arguments raised for the first time on appeal would not be considered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Canby, Per Curiam, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.