· 2/26/1997
Velma L. Brown v. General Telephone Company of California
Citations
- 108 F.3d 208
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1338
- 6 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 617
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 1993
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3420
- 1997 WL 78450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a pro se plaintiff could not raise a new issue on appeal where she failed to raise the issue before district court
- holding that a pro se plaintiff could not raise a new issue on appeal where she failed to raise the issue before district court
- holding that a pro se plaintiff may not raise a new issue on appeal where the issue was not raised before the district court
- pro se appellant's arguments raised for the first time on appeal would not be considered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcon, Canby, Per Curiam, Tashima
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.