Velilla Reyes, Lemuel v. Reyes Perez, Humberto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is the employer’s opinion on job performance, not the employee’s self-assessment, that is relevant in this inquiry
• concluding that employer did not need to supply explanation for adverse employment action because plaintiff failed to make prima facie case
• concluding that employer did not need to supply explanation for adverse employment action because plaintiff failed to make prima facie case
• recognizing that ordinarily a period of more than two months “is sufficiently long so as to weaken significantly the inference of causation between the two events”
• recognizing that ordinarily a period of more than two months “is sufficiently long so as to weaken significantly the inference of causation between the two events”
• concluding that ten weeks between the protected activity and the materially adverse action gave “rise to a sufficient inference of causation to satisfy the prima facie requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).