Skip to main content
· 8/10/2006

Velez, Carlos v. Gamboa, Ronny

Citations

  • 457 F.3d 703
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20493
  • 2006 WL 2290582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “one-time endeavor to wreak havoc upon all matters linked to a single murder investigation” had a “built-in end point” and thus lacked continuity
  • finding that an alleged scheme to frame a murder suspect did not satisfy the continuity requirement because the scheme “had a built-in end point: once the frame-up was put to rest, the scheme was over”
  • accepting interlocutory appeal and reversing denial of motion to dismiss where plaintiff faded to adequately allege continuity aspect of pattern of racketeering
  • reversing the district court’s finding of continuity even though the Morgan factors had been met
  • reversing the district court’s finding of continuity even though the Morgan factors had been met
  • reversing the district court’s finding of continuity even though the Morgan factors had been met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manion, Kanne, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.