Veldekens v. GE HFS Holdings, Inc. (In Re Doctors Hospital 1997, L.P.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that an adversary proceeding involving only state-law claims supports permissive abstention
• appellate court discusses elements of defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity and embezzlement before agreeing that the debtor merely breached a contractual obligation
• “The Fifth Circuit warns against a broad interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(O) and prefers to deem a proceeding as core under the more specific examples rather than fitting a particular proceeding into the catch-all language of subsections (b)(2)(A) and (b)(2)(O

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).