Velda J. Shore v. Maple Lane Farms, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that amplified music concerns did not fall within the “rubric” of agriculture as currently defined by the legislature
• providing that all activities held on a farm do not qualify as agricultural
• suggesting that active, rather than passive activities are more properly characterized as recreational

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).