Velasquez v. Goldwater Memorial Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff had “not presented a scintilla of evidence that other employees were permitted to speak in languages other than English”
• stating that “if plaintiff were able to present evidence that other employees were permitted to speak in, for example, Chinese or Portugese, but not Spanish, such evidence could support an inference of intentional discrimination on the basis of national origin”
• no protected activity where employee asked if there was a policy but never said she believed it was discriminatory or linked it to her protected status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).