Velasquez Cardozo v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• writing that “the application of the Hawai’i exclusionary rule factors in future cases would deter any federal and state cooperation to evade state law”
• stating that because Hawaii’s exclusionary rule protects privacy rights of defendant, those rights must “be given substantial weight when another jurisdiction’s law is involved”
• holding the exclusion of the evidence obtained by the federal authorities would deter future violations of state law even though no state actors were involved in the present search
• holding the exclusion of the evidence obtained by the federal authorities would deter future violations of state law even though no state actors were involved in the present search
• holding the exclusion of the evidence obtained by the federal authorities would deter future violations of state law even though no state actors were involved in the present search
• “[Our exclusionary rule is] unlike the exclusionary rule of the federal government and some other jurisdictions insofar as it guarantees individual privacy rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).