Velasco-Tapia v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Keller to conclude that contract contain ed “the kind of ‘specific language’ necessary to preempt” negligent misrepresentation claim
• analyzing Keller “ to mean that a general integration clause is not sufficient to bar a claim for negligent misrepresentation ” but that an additional disclaimer “ could suffice ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).