Vela v. Wagner & Brown, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding jury could have reasonably reached its damages award by making reductions to plaintiffs expert’s valuation based on flaws in the expert’s calculations
• affirming damages award within range of evidence where jury could have discounted expert = s sum based on other evidence
• reviewing court does not speculate on how jury actually arrived at award, but rather, determines whether jury could have reasonably reached award based upon record evidence
• “The jury was not required to unquestioningly accept Howell’s damages model, but was entitled to make credibility determinations and weigh the competing expert testimony about Howell’s model and the variables and assumptions upon which - 16 - 04-22-00675-CV it was based.”
• Tex. App.—San Antonio 2006, no pet.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).