Veit v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an exhibit to the complaint was “part of the pleadings” so “the 12(b)(6) motion was not converted to a motion for summary judgment”
• holding that an exhibit to the complaint was “part of the pleadings” so “the 12(b)(6) motion was not converted to a motion for summary judgment”
• concluding that an exhibit attached to the complaint was “part of the pleadings,” and thus could be relied upon by the district court without converting the defendant’s motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment
• finding that an exhibit to the complaint was part of the pleadings, and thus, the Rule 12(b)(6) motion was not converted into a motion for summary judgment
• explaining that a complaint must affirmatively allege a defendant’s citizenship to es- tablish diversity-based subject matter jurisdiction
• requiring that not only must the jurisdictional provision be stated in the complaint, but also “facts demonstrating the existence of jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).