Veile v. Martinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sufficient evidence that victim was seriously alarmed as a result of Mr. Veile’s statements that he would “ruin” the victim’s business and reputation and the victim’s religion was a cult and other harassing conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).