Veil Bros. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating “a motion to strike should not be granted unless the presence of the surplusage will prejudice the adverse party” (quoting F.T.C. v. Hope Now Modifications, LLC, Civ. A. No. 09-1204, 2011 WL 883202, at (D.N.J. Mar. 10, 2011))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).