Vega v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that, faced with other suspicious behaviors, officers may permissibly infer that drivers who use strong air fresheners are doing so to hide the smell of drugs or confuse drug-sniffing dogs
• recognizing that, faced with other suspicious behaviors, officers may permissibly infer that drivers who use strong air fresheners are doing so to hide the smell of drugs or confuse drug-sniffing dogs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-03-19· cited 5×
• Taylor v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-09-14· cited 3×
• Gilbert Alexander Hill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-06-30
• Richard Lamar Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-03-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Allen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-05-22· cited 37×
• Fernandez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-08-17· cited 25×
• Blevins v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-10-29· cited 22×
• Pincherli v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-12-31· cited 20×
• Feliciano v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-02-11· cited 16×
• Sabb v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-08-30· cited 9×
• DELAVEGA v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-10-14· cited 7×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-02-22· cited 7×