Vega v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “it would be inequitable to allow the untimely proof of claim by treating it as an amendment to the objection to confirmation. [Creditor] is a sophisticated creditor. [Creditor] had notice of the claims bar date. (cont’d
• “Chase is a sophisticated creditor. Chase had notice of the claims bar date. Chase participated in the case....Chase was represented by counsel who regularly practices in bankruptcy court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).