Vega v. Farmers Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an added policy term that “plainly disfavors insureds” violates the “no less favorable” requirement of the Oregon model statute
• explaining that, where a statutory pro- vision controls a UIM policy provision, we resolve the ques- tion by applying the methodology for interpreting statutes
• stating that terms “that disfavor insureds may be excluded or softened and extra- neous terms that are neutral or that favor insureds may be added”
• holding \the exhaustion provision violates the `no less favorable' requirement\ of state statute
• setting forth interpretations of an uninsured/underinsured motorist statute using the phrase \legally entitled to recover\
• setting forth interpretations of an uninsured/underinsured motorist statute using the phrase \legally entitled to recover\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).