Vega Garcia, Jose a v. D De Correccion Y Rehabilitacion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court erred in determining that plaintiff had failed to prove pretext and entering judgment for plaintiff
• \[The decisionmaker]'s statement that he did what he thought was best for [the employer] is a subjective reason which is legally insufficient to rebut [the employee]'s prima facie case.\
• “[The decisionmaker]’s statement that he did what he thought was best for [the employer] is a subjective reason which is legally insufficient to rebut [the employee]’s prima facie case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).