Vega Colon, Carlos v. Mapfre-Praico Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that violent union take over of factory did not implicate antitrust laws
• explaining that the Sherman Act was enacted to prevent “restraints to free competition in business and commercial transactions”
• congressional failure to alter an Act following judicial construction indicates that the judicial construction is the correct interpretation
• Sherman Act designed to prevent restraints of trade which have significant effect on business competition
• failure to overrule case law extending Sherman Act protections to labor unions indicated legislative endorsement of the case law
• prior to Sherman Act, agreements to fix prices “gave rise to no actionable wrong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).