Skip to main content
· 3/14/2014

Vederi, LLC v. Google, Inc.

Citations

  • 744 F.3d 1376
  • 110 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1001
  • 2014 WL 982758
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that “the specification is the single best guide to the meaning of a claim term” and that “the prosecution histo- ry often lacks the clarity of the specification” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • relying on provisional application, which was \incorporated by reference\ into the patent's specification, in construing claim term
  • relying on provisional application, which was “incorporated by reference” into the patent’s specification, in construing claim term
  • “In construing claims, this court relies 8 primarily on the claim language, the specification, and the prosecution history.”
  • “In construing claims, this court relies 26 primarily on the claim language, the specification, and the prosecution history.”
  • “[E]xtrinsic evidence may be less reliable than the 13 intrinsic evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Dyk, Taranto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.