Veats v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A defendant knowingly had constructive possession of a pornographic videotape even when he could not view the content because he did not have a videocassette player or electricity.
• probation revocation based on possession of a pornographic videotape

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).