Veath v. Specialty Grains, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a reviewing court will not address issues which are not essential to the determination of the case before it
• “Illinois looks to whether a reasonable construction of the contract indicates that the parties intended a limited remedy to be exclusive”
• \Illinois looks to whether a reasonable construction of the contract indicates that the parties intended a limited remedy to be exclusive\
• the contract limited the measure of damages that would have otherwise been available under the Uniform Commercial Code
• “It is a fundamental principle of the law that in order for one to recover upon a contract, he must have performed his part of the contract.”
• existence of integration clause supports conclusion that contractual remedy was intended to be exclusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Omnitrus Merging Corp. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-30· cited 80×
• Peter G. Grav, Arlene L. Grav, and the First National Bank in Sioux Falls v. The United States
  First Circuit· 1989-12-28· cited 39×
• Intrastate Piping & Controls, Inc. v. Robert-James Sales, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-06-28· cited 26×
• Cognitest Corporation, a California Corporation, and Cognitest Limited, an Israeli Corporation v. Riverside Publishing Company, a Delaware Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-02-18· cited 19×
• Al Maha Trading & Contracting Holding Co. v. W.S. Darley & Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-03-27· cited 13×
• Moody v. Federal Express Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-13· cited 9×
• Hicks v. Airborne Express, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-07-25· cited 6×
• Landale Signs & Neon, Ltd. v. Runnion Equipment Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 2017-04-03· cited 6×
• Moody v. Federal Exp. Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-10-19· cited 2×
• Moody v. Federal Express Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-10-19

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wilson v. Illinois Benedictine College
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-02-10· cited 77×
• Watson Lumber Co. v. Guennewig
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1967-02-13· cited 75×
• Cedar Park Cemetery Ass'n v. Village of Calumet Park
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1947-11-20· cited 64×
• Cotter v. Parrish
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-03-04· cited 26×
• J. D. Pavlak, Ltd. v. William Davies Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-06-17· cited 20×
• General Dynamics Corp. v. Zion State Bank & Trust Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-09-30· cited 18×
• Crest Builders, Inc. v. Willow Falls Improvement Ass'n
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-08-08· cited 17×
• Watkins v. Martin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-05-31· cited 14×
• Archibald v. Board of Education
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1959-01-22· cited 12×
• Heller v. Sullivan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-01-25· cited 9×
• Yale Development Co. v. Andermann
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-03-29· cited 7×
• Navickas v. Lawrence Hall, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1967-06-26· cited 3×