Veath v. Specialty Grains, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a reviewing court will not address issues which are not essential to the determination of the case before it
• “Illinois looks to whether a reasonable construction of the contract indicates that the parties intended a limited remedy to be exclusive”
• \Illinois looks to whether a reasonable construction of the contract indicates that the parties intended a limited remedy to be exclusive\
• the contract limited the measure of damages that would have otherwise been available under the Uniform Commercial Code
• “It is a fundamental principle of the law that in order for one to recover upon a contract, he must have performed his part of the contract.”
• existence of integration clause supports conclusion that contractual remedy was intended to be exclusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).