Veasey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Colorado Rule of Evidence 606(b), which language mirrors that of Ark. R. Evid. 606(b
• discussing jury's consideration of parole and noting that rule 606(b) \states plainly that a juror may not testify as to the effect of anything upon his mind as influencing him to assent to the verdict\
• observing that Colorado Rule of Evidence 606(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Maestas
  Utah Supreme Court· 2012-07-27· cited 176×
• Waterfield v. Quimby
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1982-12-06· cited 19×
• State v. Osborn
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-04-08· cited 12×
• Martin v. Blackmon
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1982-10-18· cited 10×
• Campbell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-03-12· cited 4×
• Christopher W. Terrell v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-04-21· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Andrews v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1971-11-01· cited 53×
• Hutcherson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-12-12· cited 24×
• Sanson v. Pullum
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1981-07-13· cited 19×
• Lewis v. Pearson
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-10-24· cited 19×
• Ashby v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-11-24· cited 12×
• Woods v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-01-24· cited 5×