Veasey v. Carson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging different burdens of proof under state termination-of-parental-rights statutes and 25 U.S.C. § 1912(f), and holding that the chancellor did not err in finding DHS had proven “all the necessary elements of the case beyond a reasonable doubt”
• “We note that the Cherokee Nation agreed at trial that the parental rights of appellants should be -terminated.”
• “We note that the Cherokee Nation agreed at trial that the parental rights of appellants should be terminated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).