Veale v. CITIBANK, F.S.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that TILA requires clear and conspicuous notice
• \TILA does not require perfect notice; rather it requires a clear and conspicuous notice of rescission rights\
• “TILA does not require perfect notice; rather it requires a clear and conspicuous notice of rescission rights”
• “We hold that ... the H-8 form provides sufficient notice that the current transaction may be canceled but that previous transactions, including previous mortgages, may not be rescinded.”
• “TILA does not require perfect notice; rather it requires a clear and conspicuous notice . . . .”
• lender’s form concerning TILA rescission rights was not perfect, but it was “reasonably clear when applied to the particular facts involved in this case” and therefore satisfied the requirements of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).