Veal v. Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, when an implied conflict does not undergo adversarial development at the hearing, the ALJ may accept and rely on the vocational expert’s testimony without resolving a later-proffered conflict
• finding the claimant’s subjective complaints were insufficient to establish an impairment where the underlying cause of the symptoms was repaired with surgery and objective medical evidence did not show an ongoing physical impairment
• explaining an ALJ only errs by failing to expressly mention or discuss an abnormality where (a) the ALJ considered the abnormality to be an impairment and (b) the ALJ determined the impairment, singly or in combination, was severe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).