Vazquez Guzman, Ericks v. R & L Development Se

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant prevented from questioning two prosecution witnesses on the sentencing reduction they received in return for their testimony
• one witness had been sentenced and was testifying under cooperation agreement; another witness had pleaded guilty and was awaiting sentencing
• introduction of tax history in narcotics cases may be admissible “when it reasonably supports the government’s assertion that the defendant possessed substantial cash not obtained through legitimate means”
• remanding for a new trial following Confrontation Clause violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).