Vayner v. Vayner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f it is found that a constitutional right is being threatened or impaired, a finding of irreparable injury is mandated.”
• “‘A plaintiff’s harm from the denial of a preliminary injunction is irreparable if it is not fully compensable by monetary damages.’”
• “[I]f it is found that a constitutional right is being threatened or impaired, a finding of irreparable injury is mandated.”
• “[I]f it is found that 5 In the usual course, a district court should conduct an evidentiary hearing before issuing a permanent injunction. See Wedgewood Ltd. Partnership I v. Township Of Liberty, Ohio, 610 F.3d 340, 349 (6th Cir. 2010
• “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(c) ‘requires a district court to make specific findings concerning each of these four factors, unless fewer are dispositive of the issue.’” (emphasis added) (quoting In re DeLorean Co., 755 F.2d 1223, 1228 (6th Cir. 1985))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).