Vaval v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Before the sale, Breckenridge had given Ashmore cashier’s checks in various amounts made payable to an entity affiliated with Breckenridge.”
• “Attorney’s fees are not appropriate under [Idaho Code section] 12-120(3) unless the commercial transaction is integral to the claim, and constitutes the basis upon which the party is attempting to 19 recover.” (citation omitted)
• “Attorney’s fees are not appropriate under [Idaho Code section] 12-120(3) unless the commercial transaction is integral to the claim, and constitutes the basis upon which the party is attempting to 19 recover.” (citation omitted)
• “The claims certainly spun out of a potential commercial transaction that Breckenridge hoped to make through a successful bid. Yet its lawsuit was based, not on any transaction, but on independent allegations of equity and tort law.” (emphasis original)
• “The claims certainly spun out of a potential commercial transaction that Breckenridge hoped to make through a successful bid. Yet its lawsuit was based, not on any transaction, but on independent allegations of equity and tort law.” (emphasis original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).