Vause v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “having accepted the benefits of the suspended sentence, the appellant is now es-topped to challenge the imposition of the unsuspended term as violative of Heggs upon violation of supervision”
• affirming the denial of the defendant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to rule 3.800(a), finding that because the defendant accepted the benefits of the suspended sentence, he was estopped from challenging the impropriety of the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ortiz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-08· cited 9×
• State v. White
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-10· cited 3×
• Stice v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-15
• McKinney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-11

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Heggs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-17· cited 853×
• Stroble v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-07· cited 15×
• Dupree v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-13· cited 9×