Vaught v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the question of whether an insurer suffered prejudice from the insured's failure to cooperate “is generally one of fact for the jury and becomes one of law for the court only where there can be but one reasonable inference from the evidence”
• holding the secondary evidence is only admissible when \the primary evidence of the fact to be proved is satisfactorily shown to have been lost or destroyed without the fault of the party desiring to prove the fact\ (emphasis added and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).