Vaughn v. ZONING HEARING BD. OF SHALER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that substantial expenditures to build a retaining wall and the anticipated 5 In a traditional variance application matter, [t]o show unnecessary hardship an applicant must prove that either: (1
• finding that substantial expenditures to build a retaining wall and the anticipated cost of removal of the wall satisfied the 6 In a traditional variance application matter, [t]o show unnecessary hardship an applicant must prove that either: (1
• zoning board had jurisdiction to grant a “variance by estoppel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).