Skip to main content

Vaughn v. State

Citations

  • 493 S.W.2d 524
  • 1972 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding DWI conviction where officer testified that he saw appellant‘s car weaving down the road, that appellant was speeding, that appellant‘s eyes were bloodshot, and that appellant told officer he had drunk several beers
  • lay witnesses can express an opinion of whether a person is intoxicated based solely on observation
  • “It is elementary in Texas that one need not be an expert in order to express an opinion upon whether a person he observes is intoxicated.”
  • “It is elementary in Texas that one need not be an expert in order to express an opinion upon whether a person he observes is intoxicated.”
  • “It is elementary in Texas that one need not be an expert in order to express an opinion upon whether a person he observes is intoxicated.”
  • the evidence was sufficient because there was testimony that the defendant was weaving on the road, the defendant’s eyes were bloodshot, and the defendant said that he had been drinking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.