Vaughn v. Sexton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding controlling individual of ERISA obligors personally liable for withdrawal payments
• “the pension plan trustees demanded payment . . . from [the stockholders of the contributing employer]”
• “[T]he defendants described the trust as an alter ego of Mr. Sexton. The effect of this concession, in our view, is that Mr. Sexton may be held personally liable for the obligations of the trust.”
• “Even the cases allowing certain defenses to bypass arbitration state that the existence of a question of statutory interpretation is not, by itself, sufficient to eliminate the arbitration requirement and that factual issues must always be arbitrated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).