Vaughn v. Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a violation of a right-of-way statute is negligence as a matter of law
• holding that “statutes obviously have no legal application, as such, so far as the regulation of traffic on private property is concerned.”
• “[S]tatutes obviously have no legal application, as such, so far as the regulation of traffic on private property is concerned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).