Vaughn v. Gunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that, if a settlor's intent cannot be determined from a trust instrument's plain language, the court must examine the facts to determine the settlor's intent
• indicating that, if a settlor’s intent cannot be determined from a trust instrument’s plain language, the court must examine the facts to determine the settlor’s intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ragsdale v. Progressive Voters League
  Texas Supreme Court· 1990-12-31· cited 533×
• Ortega v. First RepublicBank Fort Worth, N.A.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1990-02-28· cited 54×
• Lehman v. Corpus Christi National Bank
  Texas Supreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 35×
• In Re Ray Ellison Grandchildren Trust
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2008-04-02· cited 31×
• Armstrong v. Hixon
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-11-30· cited 27×
• Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Welch
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-11-07· cited 26×
• McFadden v. Bresler Malls, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1975-07-23· cited 20×
• Elliott v. Hiddleson
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-03-18· cited 19×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. L. Moody & Co., Bankers (Unincorporated)
  S.D. Texas· 1974-03-25· cited 15×
• Lucie Carr Armstrong, Jr. v. Sarita Storey Armstrong Hixon
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-10-26
• Opinion No.
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2004-05-12
• Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
  Texas Attorney General Reports· 2004-07-02
• Davis v. Waldron
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1971-01-21

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Vaughn v. Gunter
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1970-07-24· cited 32×