Skip to main content
· 2/1/1890

Vaughn v. California Central Railway

Citations

  • 83 Cal. 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant did not establish prejudice when he failed to show that the objection he believed counsel should have made would have been successful
  • not a violation of golden rule to ask jury to consider the feelings of the victim’s family

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.