Vaughan v. Goode

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure-to-mitigate argument was without merit because defendant could not show that plaintiff failed to act reasonably
• finding that the damages award to plaintiffs would be taxed and therefore should be grossed-up to give plaintiffs full restitution
• “[t]he court cannot go behind the settlement in an attempt to reconstruct which positions merit judicial endorsement”
• judicial estoppel cannot be invoked where litigation was settled because “[t]he court cannot go behind the settlement in an attempt to reconstruct which positions merit judicial endorsement.”
• damages corresponded tax deductions for sales losses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).