Vaughan v. Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expressing that the Wallach extension is consistent with Kennedy’s underlying purpose to bar retrial when the prosecutor acts “with the intent ‘to subvert the protections afforded by the Double Jeopardy Clause’” (quoting Kennedy, 456 U.S. at 676, 102 S. Ct. at 2089)
• “For retrial to be barred, the prosecutor’s aim must be to subvert the protections of double jeopardy.”
• Oregon v. Kennedy would bar retrial after defense-requested mistrial when “prosecutor engaged in misconduct with the specific intent to avoid an acquittal which the prosecutor believed was likely to occur in the absence of the misconduct”
• Oregon v. Kennedy would bar retrial after defense-requested mistrial when \prosecutor engaged in misconduct with the specific intent to avoid an acquittal which the prosecutor believed was likely to occur in the absence of the misconduct\
• Oregon v. Kennedy would bar retrial after defense-requested mistrial when \prosecutor engaged in misconduct with the specific intent to avoid an acquittal which the prosecutor believed was likely to occur in the absence of the misconduct\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).