Vasura v. Acands

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding case to state court, concluding “because diversity jurisdiction was lacking at the time of removal . . . this case was improvidently removed”
• remanding case where there was not complete diversity between the parties
• defendant failed to meet “no possibility” standard where complaint broadly stated all possible ways defendants caused plaintiff’s injury
• “Without question Atlas Turner was not a foreign state in 1999 when this lawsuit was filed”
• broad allegations that the defendants “produced, manufactured, specified, supplied, installed or distributed” the product to which the plaintiff was exposed was sufficient to state a claim
• “If the removal was not proper in the first instance, the state court was never divested of jurisdiction and the federal court consequently has no jurisdiction to exercise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).