Vasquez v. Poole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the fact that the identification took place only one-and-a-half hours after the incident was “extremely significant”
• contending the “magistrate failed to disclose pertinent facts in relations to the operability of the firearm” and statutory “exceptions”
• description did not bolster or detract from pre-trial identification where there were minor discrepancies which were roughly consistent with the ultimate identification
• denial of habeas in part because Biggers factors suggested reliability despite prior description and level of certainty casting doubt on reliability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).