Vasquez v. Kirkland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “cases involv[ing] the use of a defendant’s own 28 statements against him” do not implicate Sixth Amendment
• noting that the Fifth Amendment’s right against self incrimination and not the Sixth Amendment’s right to confront witnesses is implicated by use of a defendant’s own statement
• noting that the Fifth Amendment’s right against self incrimination and not the Sixth Amendment’s right to confront witnesses is implicated by use of a defendant’s own statement
• \We rely on the state appellate court's decision for our summary of the facts of the crime.\
• “We rely on the state appellate court’s decision for our summary of the 16 facts of the crime.”
• “We rely on the state appellate court’s decision for our summary 28 of the facts of the crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).