Vasquez v. Gertler & Gertler, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wholly resting its finding that defendant did not violate § 1692e on its finding that defendant did not violate § 1692g
• “[O]ur overshadowing determination is dispositive because the only way in which he claims this language is misleading is that it contradicts and overshadows.”
• letter requesting debtor’s “immediate attention and cooperation by sending me your payment or contacting me without further delay” simply provides the debtor with two possible courses of action, and complies with section 1692g as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).