Skip to main content

Vasquez v. California

Citations

  • 45 Cal. 4th 243
  • 195 P.3d 1049
  • 85 Cal. Rptr. 3d 466
  • 2008 Cal. LEXIS 13628

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “within the statutory parameters[,] courts retain considerable discretion” and that a reviewing court will generally “uphold the trial court’s decision to award attorney fees under section 1021.5, unless the court has abused its discretion”
  • noting that “[e]ven the federal courts, which reject the catalyst theory, recognize a 20 consent decree as a sufficient basis for awarding attorney fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Werdegar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Vasquez v. California

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.