Skip to main content
· 9/7/2000

Vasquez v. Adair (In Re Adair)

Citations

  • 253 B.R. 85
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7839
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 10431
  • 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1043
  • 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 205
  • 2000 WL 1370428

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “[i]n considering a motion to revoke abandonment of an asset, it is appropriate to consider the length of time between closure of the case and the request to reopen”
  • “[I]t is appropriate to consider the length of time between closure of the case and the request to reopen.”
  • “[I]t is appropriate to consider the length of time between closure of the case and the request to reopen.”
  • where abandonment of personal injury claim was not revoked even though debtor scheduled its value as \unknown\ and letter from debtor's personal injury attorney described recovery as \speculative at best\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perris, Montali, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.