Vasky v. ZHB of Newton Twp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The maxim, expressio unius est exclusio alterius, exists only as an aid to statutory interpretation and its application should be limited to ascertaining legislative intent which is not otherwise apparent.” (Citation omitted.)
• “[PJursu-ant to the plain language of HRS § 657-5, the judgment expired on March 8, 1994—ten years after the original judgment [ (the first judgment) ] was rendered.”
• \[I]t is uncontroverted that International Savings did not renew or extend its judgment against Wiig before the ten[-]year period had run\; therefore, \all the rights and remedies appurtenant to that judgment terminate[d].\
• “[I]t is uncontroverted that International Savings did not renew or extend its judgment against Wiig before the ten[-]year period had run”; therefore, “all the rights and remedies appurtenant to that judgment terminate[d].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).